We’re actually NPC’s in his Metaverse

Followers slammed Dana White after Mark Zuckerberg was seen cageside at UFC Vegas 61 alongside together with his spouse. The occasion was closed to the media and followers, with rumors suggesting that it will be completely staged for the Meta CEO.

White, who had beforehand assured followers that Zuckerberg didn’t hire out the UFC Apex, was accused of ‘mendacity’. Mocking the Fb chief, a fan acknowledged that we’re most likely non-player characters in his Metaverse. @LeftyRighty84 wrote:

We’re truly npc’s in his metverse

One other urged that Zuckerberg had introduced the UFC Apex as an alternative of renting it.

Mark Zuckerberg is a dick for renting out the Apex.

Whereas White misplaced credibility with followers typically, some even put the blame solely on him moderately than on Zuckerberg.

@aaronbronsteter Surprise how lengthy earlier than #DanaLied tendencies……… The best way he makes his fighters seem like morons is so gross.

@SpinninBackfist When Dana stated it was bullshit, that ought to’ve been the best indicator that it was true. 😂

@DamonMartin I guess that is a kind of issues that Dana does some shady stuff however individuals ignorantly blame another person. Often fighters, however on this case Zuckerberg.

Luke Thomas of CBS Sports activities opined that Mark Zuckerberg allegedly renting out the UFC Apex is not crucial query. Thomas believes that we have to dwell on whether or not the Meta CEO’s presence is synonymous with everybody else’s absence. The American journalist wrote:

“Of us getting misplaced into the query of ‘hire’ as if that is the central one. The problem is whether or not everybody else’s absence is a perform of his presence, not whether or not that is predicated on a monetary transaction.”

Of us getting misplaced into the query of ‘hire’ as if that is the central one. The problem is whether or not everybody else’s absence is a perform of his presence, not whether or not that is predicated on a monetary transaction. twitter.com/barstoolsports…

@lthomasnews This complete factor is gross to me. The media and followers aren’t ok to be round him? Unreal.

Having to struggle in entrance of solely tremendous wealthy individuals looks like some actual shady underground struggle membership stuff lol

Some followers imagine that the rationale White dared shut off the occasion for the media and followers was due to it being a comparatively weak card. Others recommend that Zuckerberg may be a possible purchaser of the UFC.

@SpinninBackfist Why did not he simply do that throughout covid when it was empty anyway?! As a substitute of costing 20k followers expertise to the fights? No less than it was a shit card. I suppose dana would by no means enable rhat to occur if I used to be an honest card. Or ppv card. However nonetheless. . . That is bullshit.

@erikmagraken Undecided if anybody’s printed this however 1 factor I bear in mind when Endeavor introduced in was 1 commentator saying he did not suppose Ari & co in for lengthy haul. Simply get it to sure stage & promote. I do know Zuck’s fortunes virtually in (comparitive) freefall, however he’d be a (pot) focused purchaser


Ilir Latifi calls out Mark Zuckerberg for a bonus

Ilir Latifi met Aleksei Oleinik in the one heavyweight bout of the UFC Vegas 61 card. ‘The Sledgehammer’ scored a dominant choice win over Oleinik, outpointing the veteran each on the ft and on the bottom.

Latifi took ‘The Boa Constrictor’ down early in spherical 1 and spent the remainder of the opening body in prime management. ‘The Sledgehammer’ was visibly sooner on the ft than his veteran opponent. Latifi outlanded Oleinik all through the remainder of the bout, urgent him towards the cage at common intervals and touchdown takedowns.

In his post-fight octagon interview, Latifi urged Mark Zuckerberg, who was current cageside, to throw in a bonus. The 40-year-old stated:

“I would like that bonus tonight. And Mark, I do know Mark from Fb is right here. You possibly can throw in a bonus too, . Assist us out.”




Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply